Exact(10)
The argument is invalid.
The argument is invalid in conflating these two ideas.
But if (3) is not physical, the response is that the argument is invalid).
Without any assumption about your probability assignment to God's existence, the argument is invalid.
Doing this, one may may say that the argument is invalid, having true premises but a false conclusion.
(He says representations "should be" of the world, but the argument is invalid with the addition of the auxiliary verb).
Similar(50)
To see that this argument is invalid, consider the following counterexample.
Opponents reply that this argument is invalid; it is possible for the premises to be true even though the conclusion is false.
Mills says that this argument is invalid, because a physical event can have features not explained by the event which is its sufficient cause.
Since the semantic concept of validity involves the notion of possibility, one can also derive validity liars such as Pseudo-Scotus' paradox: 'Squares are squares, therefore, this argument is invalid' (Read 1979).
There are three main possibilities here: (i) Plato simply missed the fact that the second argument is invalid; (ii) Plato intended his readers to recognize the argument as invalid; and (ii) Plato unintentionally misstated P5* as P5.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com