Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
A person who has suffered in the way that the appellant has suffered, and has struggled to cope with the consequences of his suffering in the way he has struggled, has the right to tell the world about it.
A person who has suffered in the way the appellant has suffered, and has struggled to cope with the consequences of his suffering in the way that he has struggled, has the right to tell the world about it.
In April 2010 the government made that harder by adopting new rules stopping legal aid for most challenges brought purely in the public interest (ie, the appellant has nothing to gain personally), to cut down the number of adverse judicial decisions.
The appellant has indeed behaved badly, but no worse than many of his age who have also lived as members of the Australian community all their lives but who happen to be citizens.
Similar(56)
"The prosecution also had to exclude the possibility that the appellant had determined to conduct meetings about parliamentary business with his staff member at a location other than Parliament House for reasons which he considered adequate".
As is stated on letters to appellants: "Although an out-of-country appeal may be less advantageous … than in country, article 8 [of the convention] does not require that the appellant have access to the best possible procedure, only access to a procedure that meets the essential requirements of effectiveness and fairness".
The judge said:"It appears that at the time of making the order the Secretary of State was unaware that the grant of British nationality to the appellant had caused him to lose his Iraqi nationality, and that the issue of statelessness was therefore not given the consideration it would otherwise have been given".
In the Malaysian case Tan Tek Seng v. Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan (1996), the appellant had appealed against his wrongful dismissal from employment on the grounds of procedural unfairness.
Applying those legal principles, the Court held that the appellant had failed to prove that her detention had been made for reasons unrelated to national security.
In Westminster Corporation v. London and North Western Railway Co. (1905), the appellant had a statutory power to provide public sanitary conveniences and to construct these in, on, or under any road.
The Court concurred, holding that the Committee had not properly considered that the appellant had reviewed the incomplete form with his audit manager and had instructed him how to fill in the rest of it.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com