Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
The analysis is excellent.
But the analysis is suggestive.
The analysis is totally boring.
The analysis is quite worrying.
"So the analysis is still speculative.
"The analysis is flawed," he said.
But some of the analysis is based on new evidence.
The analysis is based on evidence seen in a match.
But the analysis is pitched low, and often gushes.
The first problem is much of the analysis is vapid.
The analysis is there; it's been the oomph that's lacking".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com