Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(27)
The accuracy was evaluated through cadaveric surgery.
The accuracy was evaluated by means of a recovery study.
The accuracy was evaluated for each 500-ms window, and the maximum value of the accuracies was estimated as the classification accuracy.
The accuracy was evaluated through both parametric (Pearson, top) and a-parametric (Spearman, bottom) correlation coefficients to avoid bias due to potential non-linear relationships of enrichment scores31.
The accuracy was evaluated by the analysis of four standard reference materials (SRM).
The accuracy was evaluated by the analysis of a certified reference material of urban particulate matter.
Similar(33)
In this contribution, the accuracy is evaluated for the non-common clock scheme of the receivers and the common clock scheme of the receivers, respectively.
The accuracy is evaluated by comparing the percent differences between the natural frequencies solved using the reverse receptance method and the standard finite element method.
In this study the accuracy is evaluated by comparison with the global Terra MODIS NDVI (MOD13C2 Collection 5) data using linear regression trend analysis.
The accuracy is evaluated by daily snow depth measurements at seven climate stations and additional snow course measurements at 16 profiles in the period 2000 2013.
The method is tested with an LMS adaptive filter and the accuracy is evaluated graphically.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com