Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(21)
On the contrary, the EC classification defines four possible groupings only, depending on the EC level (6 clusters at the 1st level, 39 at the second, etc).
In the protein network diagram that was derived from the database retrieval with Predictome, among the 72 RKIP-related proteins, 43 proteins were classified as the 1st level neighbors of RKIP, 16 proteins were classified as the 2nd level neighbors of RKIP, 9 proteins were classified as the 3rd level neighbors of RKIP, and 4 proteins were found to not interact with RKIP.
In the protein network diagram that was derived from the database retrieval with MiMI, among the 72 RKIP-related proteins, 16 proteins were classified as the 1st level neighbors of RKIP, 19 proteins were classified as the 2nd level neighbors of RKIP, 29 proteins were classified as the 3rd level neighbors of RKIP, and 8 proteins were found to not interact with RKIP.
In the protein network diagram that was derived from the database retrieval with the functional linage network, among the 72 RKIP-related proteins, 41 proteins were classified as the 1st level neighbors of RKIP, 21 proteins were classified as the 2nd level neighbors of RKIP, and 10 proteins were classified as the 3rd level neighbors of RKIP.
(P1: field note in the 1st level hospital) Common postpartum rooms that were shared between 4-6 women, and the lack of privacy therein, were seen as further barriers regarding humanized birth in the hospitals.
Fig. 6 Two-pass cross window generation in the 1st level region (red color) uses a smaller distance threshold, L1 and a large color similarity threshold τ1 and uses a larger L2 and a smaller τ2 in the 2nd level region (blue color).
Similar(39)
Hat tip: The 700 Level.
sliding back below the 10,000 level.
The 50 level separates growth from contraction.
All come from the B2 level, just below the concourse.
On this measure, the 2013-14 level is about 54%, again well below the record level of 77% in 1995-96.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com