Sentence examples for that would be jeopardized from inspiring English sources

The case was closely watched, with friend-of-the-court briefs filed not only by the Trump administration, but also by 14 states saying they had similar laws or prospective laws that would be jeopardized.

Yet there is resistance to Gorbachev's changes from several different groups, including party and government officials who have comfortable posts that would be jeopardized by proposed changes.

"But we will continue the defend the CFPB and believe that its structure is totally constitutional". The bureau does important work that would be jeopardized if Cordray were removed, Mierzwinski said.

"We believe we have a special culture here that would be jeopardized by the kind of hostile actions that characterize the union's approach to dealing with the company," said Karen L. Carnahan, Cintas's treasurer.

During a 20-minute phone call Wednesday night, Mr. Obama warned Mr. Morsi that relations would be jeopardized if the authorities in Cairo failed to protect American diplomats and stand more firmly against anti-American attacks.

During a late-night, 20-minute phone call, Mr. Obama warned Mr. Morsi that relations would be jeopardized if Egyptian authorities failed to protect American diplomats and stand more firmly against anti-American attacks.

As the NYT notes, when the ACLU sued on behalf of Awlaki's father seeking to enjoin Obama from killing his son, the Obama DOJ invoked the "state secrets" privilege, insisting that the evidence against Awlaki was so secret that national security would be jeopardized if disclosed to the court: the very same alleged evidence that Obama officials are now spilling to the NYT.

At this point, Mr. Diamond notified the county last month that the state reimbursement funds, something over $320 , 000 would be withheld, and he indicated that future funds would be jeopardized.

Southern asserts that all this would be jeopardized if it acquiesced to environmental regulations it finds onerous or irresponsible.

It's usually called a prior restraint, and it's usually highly suspect; the U.S. Supreme Court held publication of the Pentagon Papers could not be restrained despite the government's claim that national security would be jeopardized.

Last month, White House officials asked The New York Times to withhold Mr. Mansour's name from an article about the peace talks, expressing concern that the talks would be jeopardized — and Mr. Mansour's life put at risk — if his involvement were publicized.