Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

that was interested

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "that was interested" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be "that was interesting" if you are describing something that captures attention or curiosity. Example: "The documentary we watched last night was so captivating that I can confidently say that it was interesting."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

45 human-written examples

"I used to know everyone that was interested in the language.

News & Media

Independent

One firm that was interested in IMG, Colony Capital, made a preemptive bid that was rebuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times

Janet was able to find a gallery in Jersey City that was interested in them".

News & Media

The New York Times

"We wanted to make sure it was accessible to anyone in New York that was interested in technology and design," Mr. Pritzker said.

News & Media

The New York Times

Many replies opened with expressions of relief – "I've never encountered anyone or anything that was interested in the general ideas men have about masculinity".

News & Media

Independent

Part of Dilfer's problem, according to a team that was interested in him, is that his demeanor is too low-key in interviews.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

15 human-written examples

There are nonprofit groups that are interested.

News & Media

The New York Times

There are a lot of business people that are interested.

News & Media

The New York Times

"We have multiple teams that are interested in playing.

All these other directors that were interested took other jobs.

Only nodes that are interested get the resource.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "that was interested". Instead, use phrases like "that was interesting" if you're describing something intriguing, or "who was interested" if referring to someone showing interest.

Common error

Many writers mistakenly use "that was interested" when they mean "that was interesting" or "who was interested". Ensure you're using the correct adjective form (interesting) to describe something that evokes interest, or the correct relative pronoun (who) to refer to someone expressing interest.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "that was interested" functions as a relative clause, attempting to modify a noun by describing a state of being interested. However, Ludwig AI points out that the phrase is grammatically incorrect in standard English. The intended meaning often needs the substitution of "interesting" or a rephrasing using "who was interested".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Science

25%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "that was interested" appears frequently across various sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The intended meaning often requires using "that was interesting" or "who was interested", depending on whether you're describing something intriguing or referring to someone showing interest. Given its prevalence despite being incorrect, it's crucial to understand the correct alternatives to ensure clear and accurate communication. Always consider the context and aim for grammatical precision to avoid misinterpretations.

FAQs

What's wrong with using "that was interested"?

The phrase "that was interested" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase to use when describing something that evokes interest is "that was interesting". Alternatively, if you are referring to a person or entity showing interest, use "who was interested".

What can I say instead of "that was interested" when describing something?

When describing something that evokes interest, use alternatives such as "that was interesting", "that was "engaging"", or "that was "captivating"".

Which is correct, "that was interested" or "who was interested"?

"Who was interested" is grammatically correct when referring to a person or entity displaying interest. "That was interested" is generally incorrect and should be replaced with "that was interesting" when describing something that evokes interest.

How do I use "who was interested" in a sentence?

You can use "who was interested" to describe individuals or groups showing interest in something. For example, "We sent the proposal to everyone "who showed interest" in the project".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: