Suggestions(1)
Exact(8)
It is therefore fitting that the Fool gets the final say; sending the audience off with much to ponder.
And oh how my heart sank when, as I took my seat for the production's second half, I remembered that the Fool wouldn't be returning to the stage.
We begin from the point that the Fool entertains the idea of that than which no greater can be conceived (because the Fool understands the words "that than which no greater can be conceived").
But the real essence of the name coming from Shakespeare is that the fool was the one who could tell the king the truth without risking losing his head.
And then the reductio argument is produced to establish that that than which no greater can be conceived cannot exist only in the understanding but must also possess the property of existing in reality as well (and all mention of the Fool, and what it is that the Fool believes, disappears).
Here is a modest attempt to provide such an analysis: We start with the claim that the Fool understands the expression "being than which no greater can be conceived", i.e., even the Fool can entertain the idea or possess the concept of a being than which no greater can be conceived.
Similar(52)
(It is a single word that means "the fool comes tumbling down the hill").
On this morning, it seemed that the fools carried fishing rods.
An exasperated Lyndon Johnson groused to Ted Kennedy that "the fools had to go to projecting" Medicare costs "down the road five or six years".
He suggested that even "the fool" can understand this concept, and this understanding itself means that the being must exist in the mind.
Just one national election later, Peggy Noonan looks like the fool that she is.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com