Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
By now you must have a big file telling you that statement is erroneous.
Similar(58)
He ruled that because the claim summed up information in the book, the First Amendment protected it, even though the statement was erroneous.
A partner with the multinational law firm Norton Rose Fulbright in Melbourne, Elisa de Wit, told Guardian Australia the statement was "erroneous".
Any defendant who is convicted could argue in an appeal that Judge Sand's ruling on the admissibility of the statements was erroneous and that the conviction should be reversed for that reason.
But some of the ad's statements are erroneous.
That statement is profoundly true.
That statement was premature.
That statement wasn't surprising.
That statement was later retracted.
H.P. insists that such reasoning is erroneous.
The central insight of New York Times v. Sullivan - the insight that led the Court to re-frame the constitutional law of libel - was, in the words of Justice William J. Brennan, who wrote the Court's opinion, that "erroneous statement is inevitable in free debate" and that such errors "must be protected if the freedoms of expression are to have the 'breathing space' that they 'need to survive.'".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com