From the description in their article, it seems that recordings were obtained during daytime singing, while we only recorded individuals during dawn chorus.
Fifty years later, with the recording industry shrinking yearly, it seems safe to say that recordings didn't trump live performance.
Ms. Rosen's amendment, which passed along with the budget bill, was meant to remove any ambiguities by stipulating that recordings were works for hire -- something already provided for by most recording contracts.
Only one recording was performed on any one coverslip of cells to ensure that recordings were made from cells not previously exposed to chemical stimuli.
It's not so much that recordings are deceptive or meagre.
(Back then, arrangements served the function that recordings do now, spreading music to a wide public).
Colonel Lind emphasized that recordings were not allowed at any court-martial proceeding.
But he added that recordings would not have mattered in Mr. Soffar's case.
Ninety-nine yeago ago, John Philip Sousa predicted that recordings would lead to the demise of music.
Today, with the exceptions of a handful of stars, most artists understand that recordings will not make them a living.
As he explained in his autobiography, he thought that recordings were the antithesis of "ephemeral and unrepeatable" live performances.
