Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(26)
According to the Civilian Complaint Review Board, the number of reports charging abuse of authority by the police increased between 1998 and 2002, with a number of them alleging that premises were wrongfully entered.
We extend the theory by admitting that premises can be defeated and relaxing the implicit assumption about their strength.
The proposal here is that we may consider doing without some of the standard rules governing the way that premises (or conclusions) of an argument may be combined.
The conception of validity we have been using (PPP) takes as central the fact that premises are accepted with degrees of confidence less than certainty.
Only arguments that are "epistemically serious" can accomplish this; that is, only arguments that satisfy the extra-formal requirement that premises are knowable independently of their conclusions, and are more acceptable epistemically than their conclusions, can fulfill this function.
The legal doctrine can thus be logically expressed as \((p\land q \leftrightarrow r\), stating that premises p and q are both necessary and sufficient for the conclusion r.
Similar(34)
Mr. O'Rourke questioned that premise.
But they rarely back that premise up.
For Dr. Flowers, that premise is troubling.
Now it appears that premise was wrong.
Even suggesting that premise makes Thibodeau chuckle nervously.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com