With this in mind, when word on the street is that there's a new novel everyone loves, I go ahead and buy not only it, but the whole series, all books published by that particular author, and sometimes even whatever Amazon recommends for people who have liked this book.
After the authors have completed this, the badges would then appear next to their names on the journal article, and double-clicking on a badge would lead to the ORCID site for that particular author, where the author's badges, integrated with their publishing record, live.
The fact that this particular author happens to be Jewish and a woman will raise even more eyebrows among Iran's ideological attack dogs.
These prizes for lesser masterpieces struck me as high-minded instances of rule bending, a way of acknowledging that a particular author belonged in the Pulitzer canon, even if the canon itself was slow on the uptake.
(The award that year went to Margaret Ayer Barnes's "Years of Grace," now out of print). These prizes for lesser masterpieces struck me as high-minded instances of rule bending, a way of acknowledging that a particular author belonged in the Pulitzer canon, even if the canon itself was slow on the uptake.
I tested this out the following section by having students identify and explain how some of the primary sources they had seen were similar to the evidence that a particular author used to support her argument, and how other primary sources may have challenged the author's perspective or argument.
Flicking through a new book that I recently bought, I was struck by the fact that the cover didn't include the author's Twitter account details, despite the fact that this particular author is very active on Twitter.
In that particular study, the authors used a cut-off of 6 weeks from treatment initiation to define early death, a common time frame to delineate death as early in pediatric AML studies.
In that particular discipline Pierre Schneider, the author of a monumental study of Matisse, is pre-eminent.
To canvass public views, one recently published study sampled three sets of community representatives (1136) and found that over half (58%) agreed that waiver of consent was justified in that particular project which the authors describe as low risk[ 38].
Part of the answer seems to be that when one is dealing, for example, with a concept that is distinctive of a particular author rather than common to a whole culture, one typically faces a problem of relative paucity and lack of contextual variety in the actual uses of the word available as empirical evidence from which to infer the rule for use, or usage, constitutive of its meaning.
