that have signed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "that have signed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to individuals or entities that have completed a signing action, often in legal or formal contexts. Example: "The contract is valid only for those that have signed it."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

So far, we have about 170 alumni that have signed up.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Harvard is among 17 academic institutions that have signed on to Facebook's Sponsored Academic Research Agreement.

Harvard University

The three parties that have signed up hold nearly every seat in Congress.

The Economist

Its jurisdiction is limited to the 120 countries that have signed up.

The Economist

Those countries that have signed up to TRIPS have also accepted international copyright rules.

The Economist

Of the 139 countries that have signed its founding Rome statute, 34 are African.

The Economist

The banks that have signed on have more than a million employees worldwide.

The New York Times

Other companies that have signed on are Yahoo, Oracle and the BlackBerry's maker Research in Motion.

The New York Times

Clinton carried all dozen of the states that have signed on.

The Washington Post

She criticised investments by companies in countries that have signed the convention.

The Guardian

He would not identify the commercial tenants that have signed on so far.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "that have signed", ensure the context clearly indicates what the subjects have signed, avoiding ambiguity by specifying the document, agreement, or commitment.

Common error

Avoid using "who have signed" when referring to organizations or inanimate entities; "that have signed" is generally preferred in these cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "that have signed" functions as a relative clause, modifying a noun or pronoun. It specifies which entities or individuals have formally agreed to something by signing a document or agreement. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Academia

9%

Formal & Business

30%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "that have signed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used relative clause that serves to identify entities or individuals who have formally agreed to something, as verified by Ludwig AI. It is versatile enough for various contexts, from news and media to academic and professional settings. Related phrases include "which have ratified" and "who have agreed to", providing alternative ways to express similar concepts. Ensure clarity by specifying what has been signed and avoid using "who" for organizations. Its high frequency across authoritative sources underscores its reliability and widespread acceptance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

who have agreed to

Replaces "signed" with "agreed to", focusing on the act of agreeing rather than the formal signing.

which have ratified

Replaces "signed" with "ratified", implying a more formal and legally binding agreement.

who are signatories to

Rephrases the sentence to focus on the individuals as signatories.

that have endorsed

Substitutes "signed" with "endorsed", suggesting a public declaration of support.

that have entered into

Uses "entered into" to describe a formal agreement or contract.

that have formally approved

Uses "formally approved" instead of "signed", emphasizing a formal validation.

that have committed to

Uses "committed to" instead of "signed", emphasizing a deeper level of dedication beyond a signature.

which have subscribed to

Replaces "signed" with "subscribed to", implying ongoing agreement or support.

which have adopted

Replaces "signed" with "adopted", implying acceptance and implementation of a policy or standard.

that have acceded to

Replaces "signed" with "acceded to", indicating a formal agreement to join a treaty or convention.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "that have signed" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives such as "which have ratified", "that have endorsed", or "that have acceded to", depending on the specific context and the nature of the agreement.

Is it correct to use "who have signed" instead of "that have signed"?

"Who have signed" is generally used when referring to people, while "that have signed" is used for organizations, agreements or inanimate entities. However, both can be grammatically correct depending on the subject being referred to.

What's the difference between "that have signed on" and "that have signed"?

"That have signed on" often implies joining a group, initiative, or service, whereas "that have signed" refers to a more general act of signing a document or agreement. The "on" adds a sense of participation or enrollment.

What are some alternatives to "that have signed" when discussing a treaty?

When referring to a treaty, you might use alternatives like "which have ratified", "which have acceded to", or "that have endorsed" to describe countries that have formally agreed to the treaty's terms.