Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
It's therefore natural that manufactured utterance does not resonate.
The Naive Russellian thinks that an utterance of (4) is true in exactly those conditions under which an utterance of (1) is true.
The modification is that each utterance corresponds to one speaker.
One way to construe this relationship is that an utterance reflects a state of mind.
Was it that explicit?
This is because many philosophers think that many utterances which include no explicit ceteris-paribus clause implicitly do include such a clause.
Instead, he must have uttered a sentence that "samesays" the utterance demonstratively referred to.
The character of I is simply a function that associates an utterance of I in a particular context with the individual who makes that utterance in that context.
The American Association of University Women called on Mattel to retire that utterance, and Mattel complied — a small victory.
For example, I have the notion that all these "utterance" artists came out of Warhol.
Like all central bank chiefs, he knows that his every utterance is subjected to minute scrutiny.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com