Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Horino and Mori developed an achievement motivation scale in the form of a questionnaire that evaluates two psychometrically derived achievement motivations: self-fulfillment achievement motivation (SFAM) and competitive achievement motivation (CAM) (Horino and Mori 1991).
Similar(59)
The risk of bias was evaluated for each article with the QUADAS 2 (Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) that evaluates four domains that may bias the results.
This is a brief structured clinical interview protocol that evaluates four main areas: socially useful activities (area A), personal and social relationships (area B), self-care (area C), and disturbing and aggressive behaviors (area D).
The SF-36 is a widely used generic HRQoL instrument that evaluates eight health domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health [ 25].
Baseline HRQOL measures were collected by interview during the first 24 hours of ICU stay and 6 months after admission using the Short Form (SF -36 Health SF -36, a generic Health Survey measure that evaluates eigenericlthealthinstatus reflect physical and measurehealthat
This is a one hundred and nineteen-item, semi-structured interview that evaluates four main areas of BPD phenomenology (affective, cognitive, impulsive and interpersonal), over the previous two years, it is currently considered the international scientific standard for the assessment of BPD [ 42].
In this article we describe the data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated two prominent strategies for conducting exercise interventions using elements of social media: motivational media campaigns and online peer networks.
In MOH, onabotulinumtoxin-A 100 U was found to be ineffective on the headache days in a RCT [19], while an open label prospective study that evaluated two doses of onabotulinumtoxin-A (i.e., 155 U and 195 U) reported a significant reduction of the number of headache and migraine days for both doses, but with a superiority of the higher dosage [45].
Similarly to other trials that evaluate two or more surgical interventions, there is a risk of differential expertise bias [ 37].
PANAS [ 48] consists of 20 items that evaluate two independent dimensions: positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA).
Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) [ 42] PANAS consists of 20 items that evaluate two independent dimensions: positive affect (PA) and negative effect (NA).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com