that compared with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "that compared with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when making a comparison between two or more subjects or items. Example: "The results of the study were impressive, that compared with previous research in the same field."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That compared with a $16 million profit a year earlier.

The New York Times

That compared with $7.6 billion on the London Stock Exchange.

The New York Times

That compared with 28% last season.

The Guardian - Sport

That compared with 90.4% the week before.

The Guardian

That compared with $1.48 for regular gasoline.

The New York Times

That compared with 64percentt in 2008.

The New York Times

That compared with 25% of those on the placebo.

The Guardian

That compared with 35percentt of adults over 30.

The New York Times

That compared with increases in seven cities in May.

The New York Times

That compared with an average $778.86 in May 2000.

The New York Times

That compared with last week's rate of 5.69percentt.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "that compared with", ensure that the items being compared are clearly defined and relevant to the context. This will help maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "that compared with" when the comparison is not directly relevant or the connection between the items being compared is weak. Ensure that the comparison adds meaningful insight to the discussion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "that compared with" functions as a prepositional phrase used to introduce a comparative element. It connects a preceding statement with a contrasting or similar point, providing context or clarification. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "that compared with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction for introducing comparisons. Ludwig AI validates its correctness, highlighting its prevalence in news and media contexts. When writing, ensure the comparison is relevant and clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives such as "in contrast to" or "relative to" for nuanced expression. By understanding its function and usage patterns, writers can effectively leverage "that compared with" to enhance clarity and provide insightful comparisons in their writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in contrast to that

Emphasizes a direct opposition or difference.

as opposed to that

Draws a clear distinction, often implying preference.

relative to that

Focuses on a proportional relationship or scaling.

by comparison with that

Stresses the act of comparing as a method of analysis.

by way of comparison to that

A more formal way of introducing a comparison.

compared against that

Highlights a formal evaluation or assessment process.

in relation to that

Indicates a connection or association being considered.

when weighed against that

Suggests a careful balancing of factors in the comparison.

juxtaposed with that

Implies a side-by-side placement for contrasting effect.

considering that

Introduces a factor that should be taken into account when making a comparison.

FAQs

How can I use "that compared with" in a sentence?

The phrase "that compared with" is used to introduce a comparison between two different elements. For example: "The company's profits increased this quarter. That compared with last year's results, shows significant growth."

What are some alternatives to "that compared with"?

You can use alternatives like "in contrast to", "compared to", or "relative to" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to include "that" before "compared with"?

While "that compared with" is grammatically correct, sometimes "compared with" alone is sufficient and more concise. The inclusion of "that" often serves to provide additional emphasis or connection to a preceding statement.

What's the difference between "that compared with" and "in comparison to"?

While both phrases introduce a comparison, "that compared with" often directly follows a statement, providing an immediate point of reference. "In comparison to" tends to be used more broadly, often starting a new sentence or clause.