Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
People are worried that caucuses preclude blocs of voters — remember the military overseas — from taking part.
The Clinton campaign, by contrast, has suggested that caucuses are undemocratic, unrepresentative and controlled by party activists.
Updated For the time being, it doesn't matter whether the Clinton campaign's contention that caucuses are undemocratic is accurate – they count.
Mrs. Clinton has explained her losses by saying that caucuses disenfranchise voters because their hours are limited and that she does better when a broader cross-section of voters can participate.
What if we PRETENDED that caucuses don't count!
At several points in her campaign, Clinton argued that caucuses were somehow unfair and that Obama's victories in those states weren't really legitimate.
Similar(48)
When Jeb Bush's Latino outreach workers field questions about Trump, they often tell voters that caucusing for Bush is the best bet to combat the real estate mogul.
He explained that caucusing requires a lot of time and effort, and an understanding that most participants will spend the majority of their evening at the local precinct standing in line, listening to speeches and eventually casting their vote.
Not that the caucuses are particularly prescient.
Iowans don't always brag that the caucuses pick presidents.
Even natives need to be reminded that the caucuses go back to statehood in 1846.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com