Thus, it seems that the Bondi-Spurgin interpretation assumes something like the infinite divisibility of matter, which is clearly a hypothesis that lies "outside" special relativity.
They hold that the above reasoning falsely assumes something about numerical sameness.
It's so loud and sudden that I assume something must have gone horribly wrong.
It not something that assumes we're going to do all the work.
That said, an earlier commenter seems to have assumed something that wasn't actually the case, through no fault of his or her own anonymous comment 🙁 –as the information wasn't there.
"It's hard for a player to assume something that may not happen," Molitor said.
Yet if the last year has proven anything, it's that we should not assume something can't happen simply because it hasn't happened recently.
Something could happen by chance and you could assume something that is real when it isn't.
People assume something that isn't always correct.
"But, continuing to assume something that probably is not realistic is kicking the can down the road". But a colleague called that position imprudent.
