that are missing background information

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "that are missing background information" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to elements or details that lack necessary context or foundational information. Example: "The reports submitted by the team are incomplete, as they contain several sections that are missing background information."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Data records that were missing time, animal count information, or located on land were excluded.

Duke University

They use information that is missing on a probabilistic description logic setting.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

"Information that is missing showed she has something to hide".

The New York Times

This research goes a long way to provide valuable information that is missing.

International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering

(ii) Information that is missing from the source databases will also be missing in the integrated dataset.

Bioinformatics

All that was missing were the Jet Skis in the background.

The New York Times - Style

All that's missing is the Grateful Dead playing in the background.

Huffington Post

That's missing entirely.

Yale University

All that was missing?

Forbes

The average scores are slightly higher (but not statistically significantly so) than the average scores using the full sample with missing background information.

IZA Journal of Migration

An earlier version directly quoted comments from a Facebook spokesman that were given for background information only.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "that are missing background information", ensure that the context clearly indicates what specific background information is lacking and why it is important. This provides clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "that are missing background information" without specifying what information is missing. Vague statements weaken your message; be precise about the required background details.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "that are missing background information" functions as a relative clause, modifying a noun by specifying that it lacks necessary contextual details. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct but lacks real-world examples, highlighting the importance of providing specific context when employing it.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "that are missing background information" is a grammatically correct relative clause used to specify a lack of essential context. However, according to Ludwig AI and the absence of examples, the phrase is rarely used, so caution and contextual clarity are important. When employing this phrase, ensure you clarify what specific background details are lacking to avoid vagueness. Alternatives such as "lacking essential context" or "without sufficient backstory" can be used depending on the nuance you want to convey. Despite its correctness, consider specifying the missing information directly for greater impact and precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking essential context

Emphasizes the absence of necessary context.

without sufficient backstory

Focuses on the lack of narrative or historical context.

deficient in foundational details

Highlights the inadequacy of basic, underlying information.

missing key preliminary data

Stresses the absence of crucial introductory data.

devoid of necessary introduction

Indicates a lack of essential introductory elements.

lacking pertinent historical data

Emphasizes the absence of relevant historical information.

without adequate preliminary insight

Focuses on the lack of sufficient initial understanding.

wanting fundamental knowledge

Highlights the absence of basic, essential knowledge.

incomplete contextual framework

Indicates that the contextual framework is not fully developed.

lacking the necessary prelude

Emphasizes the absence of a necessary introductory segment.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "that are missing background information"?

Consider alternatives like "lacking essential context", "without sufficient backstory", or "deficient in foundational details" to convey a similar meaning.

What does it mean when something is described as "that are missing background information"?

It means that the subject lacks the necessary contextual or foundational details required for a complete understanding or evaluation.

Is it better to specify the missing information rather than saying "that are missing background information"?

Yes, specifying the missing information provides greater clarity and strengthens your argument. For example, instead of saying "the report is incomplete, that are missing background information", specify what context elements are missing.

In what situations is it appropriate to use the phrase "that are missing background information"?

It is appropriate when you need to point out that a piece of information, a report, or an analysis lacks essential contextual details needed for proper assessment or understanding.