Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

that actually was

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "that actually was" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to emphasize the reality or truth of a past situation or event. Example: "The movie we watched last night was surprisingly good, and that actually was a pleasant surprise."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

46 human-written examples

That actually was progress.

News & Media

The New Yorker

That actually was pretty clear about what he was doing".

News & Media

The New York Times

"That, actually, was my bad idea," Weisberg said.

News & Media

The New Yorker

LD: That, actually, was in the script, because we thought of our father.

"That actually was the first, very first scene that was produced," Mr. Powell said.

News & Media

The New York Times

"That, actually, was the one thing we disagreed on when we first saw John's programming," Mr. Guzelimian said.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

13 human-written examples

That actually is changing some.

News & Media

The New Yorker

(That "actually" is perfect).

News & Media

The New Yorker

That, actually, is relatively easy.

News & Media

The New Yorker

That actually isn't quite right.

Nobody knows what that actually is yet.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the context. While versatile, the phrase works best when emphasizing a truth or reality that might be doubted or overlooked.

Common error

Avoid using "that actually was" excessively in writing, as it can become repetitive and weaken the impact of your message. Instead, vary your sentence structure and word choice to maintain reader engagement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "that actually was" functions as a declarative statement, emphasizing the reality of a past situation or event. As Ludwig confirms, it highlights something that is, or was, indeed the case, often contrary to expectation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

94%

Science

3%

Wiki

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "that actually was" is a versatile phrase used to emphasize the reality of a past event, often in contexts where the truth might be surprising or initially doubted. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage, particularly in news and media. While suitable for various situations, it's important to avoid overuse and consider more formal alternatives like "that truly was" in certain contexts. Its communicative purpose is primarily to affirm and confirm, and it maintains a neutral register suitable for a wide range of audiences.

FAQs

How can I use "that actually was" in a sentence?

You can use "that actually was" to emphasize the truth or reality of a past event or situation, often when it might be surprising or unexpected. For example, "The presentation was surprisingly effective; that actually was one of their best performances".

What's a more formal way to say "that actually was"?

For a more formal tone, you could use "that truly was" or "that genuinely was", which provide a stronger sense of confirmation and sincerity.

Is "that actually was" interchangeable with "that really was"?

While similar, "that really was" often carries a slightly more informal tone than "that actually was". The choice depends on the context and desired level of formality.

What's the difference between "that actually was" and "that happened to be"?

The phrase "that happened to be" emphasizes the coincidental or incidental nature of something, while "that actually was" stresses the truth or reality of a past event, even if unexpected.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: