Ai Feedback
Exact(59)
Assume that (i) in Lemma 3.1 holds.
Assume first that (i) in (H5) holds.
We will say that i in L_{1} quad mbox{if } lambda_{i} |a_{i} | leq M_{1} and we will say that i in L_{2}quad mbox{if } lambda_{i} |a_{i} | > M_{1}.
Firstly, let us show that (i) in Lemma 2.1 is satisfied, which means there exists ρ > 0 such that any possible T-periodic solution x of (2.5) satisfies ∥ x ∥ ( 2 n − 1 ) < ρ. (3.1).
One might suppose, for example, that (i) in a Bratman case, the agent merely intends to try to φ and intends to try to Θ, and that (ii) it is these intentions that drive the agent's actions [Mele 1997].
To qualify for cooperation, you need to show that: (i) In isolation, cooperators grow faster than cheaters.
Suppose that (I in C^{1} X,mathbb {R})) satisfies the ({(C _{c}} -condition for any (c>0) and I is even.
So yeah, there is a fitting aspect in that I in a way capitalized on that same sense of energy and excitement through the same means.
So, which means that (i) in Lemma 2.3 is satisfied.
S1 papers argue that (i) in relation to risk, GM stacking is equivalent to conventional breeding of conventional plants.
Similar(1)
The results from the physical and numerical experiments concur that (i) in-canyon vortex dynamics and over-canopy flow conditions, are strongly dependent on the geometric features of the buildings, and (ii) pitched and round roof geometries increase in-canyon mean and turbulent velocities, as well as the depth of the shear layer.
Related(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com