Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
However, contrary to prediction, negotiators provided with the history graph put significantly more emphasis on discussing fairness than negotiators provided with the negotiation dance graph (p < .001 U = 459.5).
In hypothesis H 4(a), we assume that negotiators provided with the negotiation dance graph discuss fairness more often than negotiators provided with the history graph.
Negotiators provided with a negotiation dance graph reach balanced agreements more often than negotiators provided with the history graph.
When comparing the quality of agreements, we find that negotiators provided with the negotiation dance graph reach significantly higher joint outcomes than negotiators provided with the history graph (p = .019 U = 308.0).
There is an expectation of more balanced agreements when negotiators have information about utilities of both negotiation partners, and we hypothesize: H 6(b) Negotiators provided with a negotiation dance graph reach balanced agreements more often than negotiators provided with the history graph.
We find that negotiators provided with the negotiation dance graph use hard tactics significantly more often than negotiators provided with the history graph (p = .013 U = 603.5).
Up until now he has been little more than negotiator-in-chief with Greece's creditors and – given that his party Syriza was forced to renege on all of its promises to fight EU-required austerity – a pretty bad one at that.
No peace talks are scheduled, and even if they were they would need to reach more deeply into ordinary beliefs than negotiators can usually manage.
That's more than negotiators had been eyeing but less than the House seeks.
Negotiators provided with the history graph reach an agreement more often than negotiators provided with tables (p = .080 χ = 2.730).
In hypothesis H 2 we predict that negotiators provided with the history graph are more likely to reach an agreement than negotiators provided with tables.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com