Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(31)
The full text was reviewed by both reviewers independently (JB and MW) in all RCTs that met the pre-defined eligibility criteria (n = 63).
Greenwood's text was reviewed by Patric V. Giesler of Gustavus Adolphus College for peer-reviewed academic journal American Ethnologist.
If a document appeared relevant on the basis of its title, the full text was reviewed using the same exclusion criteria as applied to the peer-reviewed literature.
In addition, the reference list of all publications seen in full text was reviewed for potentially relevant citations not found with the data bank search.
Both authors hand-searched and screened the titles and abstracts of all publications in the three journals over the 6 months, and if possibly a report of an AR experiment, the full text was reviewed.
Free text was reviewed and categorised by two researchers.
Similar(29)
Article titles, abstracts, and text were reviewed for inclusion.
If the title or abstract is insufficient for determining eligibility, the full text is reviewed.
Responses from the free text were reviewed and classified into the appropriate category by BKE.
The final phase includes the comprehensive understanding, where the text is reviewed as a whole in light of the naïve reading and the structured analysis.
In total 1307 records which either had any one of the "a priori" terms used in codes or had the term "arthritis" in the text were reviewed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com