Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The full text eligible papers were then subjected to methodological critical appraisal.
An additional five relevant studies [ 54- 58] were identified from references listed in the full text eligible studies.
Similar(58)
We screened 647 relevant articles, and 592 were excluded, leaving us with 55 full-text eligible articles.
The full text of eligible studies obtained in the first step will be reviewed.
The full text of eligible studies was independently evaluated in duplicate by 2 reviewers (BP and EV).
The full text of eligible studies was independently evaluated in duplicate by 2 reviewers (BP and MN).
Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed the full text of eligible publications and the methodological features of included studies, resolving differences by consensus.
The feasibility and usefulness of the ERS, the method to convert text from eligible criteria to computable criteria, and a confirmation method to increase research data accuracy.
Another aim was to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of the ERS, the method to convert text form eligible criteria to computable criteria, and a confirmation method to increase research data accuracy.
Full texts of eligible studies were only obtained when both reviewers were in consensus.
After reviewing the titles and abstracts, the full texts of eligible studies were obtained.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com