Sentence examples for text eligibility from inspiring English sources

Thus, a sum of 51 articles remained for full text eligibility assessment.

We manually executed the conversion from text eligibility criteria to computable criteria.

Two investigators independently reviewed full text eligibility and reached a consensus on which studies to include for review.

Two reviewers (PM, CGL) independently assessed abstract and full text eligibility with disagreements resolved by consensus (CGL, PM, SS, DC, JBW and GL).

The same three reviewers assessed full text eligibility of the identified trials and discrepancies were resolved by consensus under the supervision of other two investigators (PC, DC).

21 22 23 w1-w15 Two trials were not original 21 22 and one made use of high intensity, continuous ultrasonography, 23 leaving 15 eligible trials (fig 1).w1-w15 After adjustment for chance the agreement between reviewers on full text eligibility was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.94).

Studies were then excluded that clearly did not meet eligibility criteria and 235 articles were assessed for full-text eligibility.

Observer agreement among the two reviewers (GZ and HM) in relation to the literature search results of title, abstract as well as full-text eligibility were 66.7%, 28.6%, 50% respectively.

Following abstract review, 50 studies were excluded and 44 studies remained for full-text eligibility assessment.

We will measure inter-rater agreement for full-text eligibility and assessment of risk of bias using the κ statistics.

We identified 1,335 references of potential eligible studies, of which 152 were assessed on full text for eligibility.