Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
tests were run
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The part of the sentence "tests were run" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you are describing an action that took place in the past, such as: "The engineers ran a series of tests to ensure the safety of the new prototype."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Another five tests were run in 2007.
News & Media
Several tests were run to assess this possibility.
News & Media
If results came out positive, further tests were run.
News & Media
Pin-bearing fatigue tests were run under load-control.
Tests were run according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The tests were run on the machine fileserver.stanford.edu, which is a gentoo box.
Academia
This past IAP, tests were run on the initial dryer to determine its drying capabilities.
"A number of tests were run by OBS this morning on parts of the course.
News & Media
Tests were run until failure and load-optical displacement data was recorded for each test.
Science
Tests were run to measure contact impedance at typical loads and slips.
Science
Fatigue tests were run with both constant and variable amplitude loading.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing a research methodology, be specific about the type of "tests were run" (e.g., statistical tests, performance tests) to provide clarity.
Common error
While "tests were run" is grammatically correct, overuse of the passive voice can make writing sound vague. Consider using the active voice (e.g., "Researchers ran the tests") when appropriate for a more direct and engaging style.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "tests were run" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a series of tests took place. It is commonly used to describe procedures in various fields. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is correct and widely used.
Frequent in
Science
53%
News & Media
28%
Academia
12%
Less common in
Formal & Business
7%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "tests were run" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly in scientific, academic, and news contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and common way to describe the execution of tests. While the passive voice is standard, consider using the active voice for a more direct style where appropriate. Related phrases like "experiments were conducted" offer alternative ways to express similar ideas. Be specific about the type of tests to enhance clarity. With a high source quality score and expert rating, this phrase is a reliable choice for conveying that tests have been performed.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
experiments were conducted
Replaces "tests" with "experiments" and "run" with "conducted", emphasizing a more formal scientific investigation.
assessments were performed
Substitutes "tests" with "assessments" and "run" with "performed", highlighting the evaluation aspect of the process.
trials were carried out
Replaces "tests" with "trials" and "run" with "carried out", suggesting a process of trying or proving something.
examinations were executed
Changes "tests" to "examinations" and "run" to "executed", emphasizing a formal or thorough investigation.
measurements were taken
Focuses on the act of measuring, implying that tests involved quantifiable results.
evaluations were undertaken
Replaces "tests" with "evaluations" and "run" with "undertaken", highlighting the act of judging or determining the value of something.
analyses were completed
Substitutes "tests" with "analyses" and "run" with "completed", emphasizing the detailed examination of something.
investigations were initiated
Focuses on the start of an investigation, implying a process of systematic inquiry.
studies were implemented
Changes "tests" to "studies" and "run" to "implemented", referring to a structured research project.
procedures were applied
Replaces "tests" with "procedures" and "run" with "applied", highlighting the use of a set of actions followed in a regular order.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "tests were run" to be more specific?
To be more specific, you can replace "tests" with the type of test, such as "statistical tests were run", "performance tests were run", or "usability tests were run" depending on the context.
Is "tests were run" formal enough for academic writing?
Yes, "tests were run" is generally acceptable for academic writing. However, consider using more precise language like "experiments were conducted" or "analyses were performed" for enhanced clarity and formality.
What's a more active way to say "tests were run"?
To use the active voice, you could say "Researchers ran the tests" or "The team conducted the tests". This makes the sentence more direct and identifies who performed the action.
Are there any alternatives to "tests were run" that imply the results were positive?
While "tests were run" doesn't inherently imply a positive result, you could follow it with a statement like "and proved successful" or "and yielded favorable outcomes" to indicate a positive result. You could also say "trials were successful".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested