Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
Four common methods, hierarchical task analysis, cognitive walkthrough, heuristic evaluation and usability tests were evaluated according to thoroughness, validity, reliability, cost effectiveness and clarity.
Three HBsAg rapid tests were evaluated: Vikia® HBsAg (Biomerieux, France), HBsAg Teste Rápido® (Doles, Brazil), and Imuno-Rápido HBsAg® (Wama, Brazil).
Laboratory tests were evaluated considering laboratory reference results.
0, 2, or 5 No standard tests were evaluated.
All statistical tests were evaluated at the 95%% confidence level using the SPSS software.
Cell viability tests were evaluated by cell counting kit-8 (CCK) and live/dead cell assay.
The tests were evaluated singly and in various combinations (composites) for diagnostic power.
The results of the tests were evaluated with the VU University Amsterdam (VUA).
Finite element model, which use the implicit dynamic solver of the commercial software Abaqus™, and experimental tests were evaluated.
However, none of the quantitative liver function tests were evaluated in the setting of acute hypoxic liver injury.
The results of the tests were evaluated statistically by using a personal computer and converted into graphics and tables.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com