Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Significance thresholds, adjusted for multiple testing, were determined by permutations of all spots on the array.
Both the monitoring schedule and the frequency of inhibitor testing were determined by the treating physician.
Statistical significance and adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing were determined by a permutation-based procedure with Π = 10,000 random permutations of the phenotypic status of the subjects.
The significance thresholds, adjusted for multiple testing, were determined by permutation, for which the same model was used, with the spot intensities randomly distributed over the genotypes (a P value that gave a ratio of false positives/true positives of <0.05 was used).
Similar(56)
Because children were distributed across the United Kingdom, selection of cases for testing was determined by availability of the children when testers were in their area.
Susceptibility testing was determined by standard methods and break points using the criteria of Bremmelgaard et al. [ 12] for screening determinations, and NCCLS [ 13] for intermediate/resistant strains.
Susceptibility testing was determined by the disk-diffusion method, according to the criteria of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology [ 9].
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was determined by Agar dilution reference method and disk diffusion tests using 30 μg disks (Biorad Laboratories, France) were performed for meropenem according to the CA-SFM recommendations [ 11].
Antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing was determined by using the disk diffusion method for erythromycin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin (8 ) and the Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) method for all 12 agents tested (3 ).
Comparative sensitivities of PCR tests were determined by testing log10 dilutions of plasmids with inserts containing corresponding provirus sequences.
The results were tested by ANOVA and optimum conditions for a verification test were determined by statistical calculations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com