Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Nasal swabs that were processed for confirmatory influenza testing by polymerase chain reaction testing were confirmed by panel (xTAG) or specific influenza A and B PCR (Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Toronto, CA).[16] Positive tests were confirmed as being caused by H1N1 using the Prodesse ProFlu-ST, Influenza A [2009] real-time PCR (H1N1 subtyping) assay (Focus Diagnostics, Cypress, CA).
Reactive antibody results on rapid testing were confirmed by the Murex third generation enzyme immunoassay the Genscreen antigen-antibody HIV test (Bio-Rad, France)—and by western blot.
Only 16 of 24 samples positive by local testing were confirmed by central testing (PPV = 67%%), although 132 of 134 samples negative by local testing were negative by central testing (NPV = 99 %).
In case of discrepancies between the new and the standard methods the results for the susceptibility testing were confirmed by the E-test The results obtained by the new and standard methods were compared, and the total percent error as well as the percent error for each drug are shown in Table 2.
Similar(56)
The scale assessments for the FAB were performed by a qualified psychiatric specialist and the testing was confirmed by a psychologist and a neurologist.
The scale assessments were done by a qualified psychiatric specialist and the testing was confirmed by a psychiatrist and a neurologist.
Diagnosis of alcohol dependence was confirmed using DSM-IV-TR criteria in a semi-structured interview by a psychiatrist (J.L./N.B .. Sobriety at time of testing was confirmed by breath alcohol readings ≤ 0.01 mg/l (Lion Alcometer S-D2; Lion LaBarryories Ltd, Barry, UK).
Discrepant test results between the two tests were confirmed by a μ-capture reference EIA.
All the results of the test were confirmed by fragment sequencing.
Both ANOVA and t-test were confirmed by effect-size using Cohen's d (t test) and f (ANOVA).
The results of the PDP tests were confirmed by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) experiments in the same corrosive media.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com