Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
As we did not correct for multiple testing, we considered the significantly higher frequency of lobular histology as a trend towards association of MUTYH variants with breast tumor histology type.
Similar(59)
If the difference of the means of the original samples fell at least >95% of the generated distribution (>97.5% for two-tailed tests), we considered the difference between groups as significant.
In the dose-response test, we considered the mean of the last two days (stable intake) for each dose.
For the Meares and Stamey test, we considered the test positive if there was a 10-fold increase in bacteria in the EPS or in the VB3 samples compared with the VB1 and VB2 specimens.
For this test, we considered the number of lp-ntPET model parameters to be seven.
In all tests, we considered the guidelines as the "gold-standard", and thus we didn't investigate potential error in the guidelines.
36 For these three tests, we considered the difference between the scores obtained at T3 and at T0 (inclusion in the PAQUID study) as a quantitative variable.
To calculate the power (1-β error probability; two-tailed) achieved by our statistical tests, we considered the actual sample size, the size of the observed effect, and the α value of 0.05.
To calculate the power (1 – β error probability; two tailed) achieved by our statistical tests, we considered the actual sample size, the observed effect size, and the α value = 0.05.
In this paper, for the purpose of an economical plan of the reliability test, we consider the sudden death procedure for assuring MTTF in Weibull distribution with variational shape parameter.
For this test, we consider the average Fourier transform of IMFs over 100 realizations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com