Sentence examples for testing size from inspiring English sources

The source code of this study are publicly available at: https://github.com/xingfang912/Understanding-deep-learning Table 2 Testing accuracy Facial recognition Emotion recognition Training size 2412 Training size 2400 Testing size 2412 Testing size 2424 Classes 67 Classes 8 Accuracy 97.55% Accuracy 90.97%.

While testing size, runtime speed, connections, design, and usability, our study shows that each version has its own advantages as we have expected.

If the new method includes statistical hypothesis testing, size and power of the test are typically evaluated; if it is a method for parameter estimation, the criteria of interest are the absolute or relative bias, the mean squared error, the variance of estimation, and the coverage of the proposed confidence intervals [ 1– 3].

With increasing the mechanical-testing size of specimen, it is demonstrated that more pronounced action of elastic recoveries of testing machine and specimen led to a decrease in plasticity because of larger shear-strain was introduced in shear bands.

Furthermore, for the specimens with the same mechanical-testing size, initial free-volume reduction with increasing the casting size of precursory-specimen also led to a degradation of plasticity as higher free-volume was required for higher shear band emission rate.

Bigger is Better When it comes to crash tests, size matters.

n determines the total train and test size and is usually restricted by cost of collecting labels through phone surveys.

The test size or volume to be injected is usually controlled by the production rate of the target well.

The application results show that our method surpasses the conventional methods in terms of both test size and coverage.

Study/test changes in relative size influenced accuracy only when targets were displayed in large test size and when target size changed between study and test; accuracy was higher for objects displayed in large test size when target size was the same (0.76) at study and test than when it was different (0.58).

In the present study, this individual variation allowed the investigation of the relationship between clinical outcome and skin test size at the level of the individual animal.