Sentence examples for testing showed no differences from inspiring English sources

ANOVA testing showed no differences in the concordance values between the seven embryologists, suggesting similar cellular quality of the biopsied samples (Fig. 1C).

A series of Fisher exact tests conducted to assess for potential biases in selection for diagnostic testing showed no differences in demographic or experiential variables (i.e., current age, age at trafficking, duration in brothel), and McNemar tests showed no relationship between likelihood of testing for syphilis or hepatitis B based on a positive HIV test result (all p>0.05).

Chi-square test showed no differences in overall expression of ER, PGR and Skp2 with respect to the different histological subtypes.

Chi-square test showed no differences in percentage of high expression of ER, PGR and Skp2 in the different histological subtypes.

Post hoc tests showed no differences in PC between the eyes open and eyes closed state in the sham condition (F 1, 16) = 0.47, pFDR > 0.050) while PC was larger during eyes open compared to eyes closed in the weak tACS condition (F 1, 16) = 14.28, pFDR < 0.010).

The results obtained 24 hours after the test showed no differences between the groups of patients, but there were differences with the control group (Figure 2A).

Heterogeneity χ2 tests showed no differences between populations (P>0.1) in all genes, providing no indication for local adaptation regardless of exposure to human pathogens, ie., comparing the zoophilic An. quadriannulatus with the anthropophilic An. gambiae and An.

Kruskal-Wallis test showed no differences in distribution of GMFCS levels (p = 0.783) or classified CP subtypes (p = 0.263) between the age groups (Table  2).

Time to complete task was converted to scaled scores based on available norms [ 37]. t-tests showed no differences between groups on CWI Inhibition and Inhibition/switching scaled scores.

Again, initial tests showed no differences between dorsal and ventral cells (for each combination of behavioural category and analysis window, χ test on the relative frequency of contralateral preference, ipsilateral preference or no preference, maximum χ2 = 5.4).

This defect was specific to attention as other tests showed no differences in visually driven behavior, motivation, visuo-spatial learning and sensorimotor abilities among the different groups of mice.