Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Research suggests that interim testing in this paradigm may increase accessibility of details presented in the synopsis (Thomas et al. 2010), and may result in test-potentiated learning of post-event details (Gordon & Thomas 2014).
In different studies, with repeated sessions of the sucrose test, preference and intake of sucrose solutions were found to increase substantially, suggesting that the results of testing in this paradigm depend on the animals' previous experience of sucrose consumption can increase sucrose intake and preference up to ceiling values decreases test's sensitivity [ 38, 47].
Similar(58)
Here we report a series of 13 studies conducted independently in two British laboratories, showing that British English-learning infants aged 8 10.5 months fail to show evidence of word segmentation when tested in this paradigm.
Male C57BL/6N mice (10TG, 16WT) were tested in this paradigm.
Although the findings of the present experiment align with previous research, it remains unclear why interim testing in this eyewitness paradigm does not result in better learning of previously tested information.
Thus, there are several reasons to expect the false recognition effect to be reflected in decreased exploration of a novel object during the test phase in this paradigm, but not necessarily during the sample phase.
However, testing this paradigm empirically in computational simulation experiments requires several assumptions to link centrality and fitness.
Finally, we tested the effect of scopolamine in this paradigm.
Hence, in this paradigm, the ACTH test serves as a useful prognostic measure.
In Section 4 we test this paradigm with a theory of injection based on a combined effect of first and second ionization potential; this reproduces the ratio of Cosmic Ray source abundances to source material abundances.
Females were then given a 3-week hormone vacation before testing in the restraint paradigm.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com