Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
There is no mandatory lab testing for fish.
For more than 20 years, testing for fish reproductive effects has typically exploited one of two (or, in the case of full life-cycle tests, both) life stages where chemicals that affect the HPG axis produce adverse outcomes such as early development (covering the window of sexual differentiation) and active reproduction.
Similar(58)
A sloping upstream face may reduce this risk, but new designs must be tested for fish passage efficiency.
Finally, we discuss the pros and cons of using the zebrafish as a pre-screening animal model to potentially speed up vaccine design and testing for aquaculture fish species.
The definitive test results for fish are based on nominal concentrations of PSOA given that the test sample analysis confirmed PSOA levels were maintained at 99 100%% of nominal concentrations over the study duration.
For qRT PCR data, the right-skewing was removed by taking copy number ratios relative to the lowest-expressing normal human EC sample ('relative copy number'), log2 transforming them to ΔCts and comparing the results through unequal variance t-test for FISH-positive vs FISH-negative USC.
For qRT PCR data, the right skewing was removed by taking copy number ratios relative to the lowest expressing normal human endometrial cells sample ('relative copy number'), log2 transforming them to ΔCts, and comparing the results through unequal-variance t-test for FISH-positive vs FISH-negative USC.
Participants were also asked to call study coordinators for ciguatera testing of fish meal remnants if they developed symptoms compatible with CFP ≤ 72 hr after eating fish during 2005 2006.
Increased monitoring is expected this year but there is no test for live fish.
Analogue pellets were pasteurized and tested for common fish pathogens prior to application.
What is also interesting is that one of the most common Folk tests for ciguatoxic fish used in the South Pacific is called the bleeder test.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com