Suggestions(1)
Exact(10)
For simplicity, when conducting the interaction analysis, both endurance and power were used as continuous variables (since both come in only two levels); hence, the analysis was reduced to testing differences in the beta values between males and females (where beta expressed the slope measuring the effect of either power or endurance).
It is a method that is probably more useful for testing differences in the mean and variances of groups along specific, constrained axes of morphospace.
Chi square tests were used for testing differences in the distribution of alcohol drinking frequency for groups.
The chi-square test (or when appropriate Fisher's exact test), was used for testing differences in the prevalence of respiratory symptoms between groups.
ANOVA with repeated measurements was performed for testing differences in the parameters of clinical score and paw thickness between the four study groups: IB-MECA group, IB-MECA + MRS 1220 group, control group, and MRS 1220 group.
Finally, construct validity was determined by testing differences in the PedsQL scores between the healthy sample and young adults with a chronic health condition also using two-sample t-tests.
Similar(50)
A paired t-test (p = 0.05) was used to test differences in the results obtained with the two different sequences for significance.
We tested differences in the sex ratio (female:male:hermaphrodite) among the sibling groups with the χ2 tests using chisq.test(x).
The aim was to compare and test differences in the conservation value of hedge bottom vegetation on organic and conventional farms.
Fisher's exact test was used to test differences in the rate of local and systemic reactogenicity events between groups, and the Cochran-Armitage test was used to investigate trends in event rates with increasing ADVAX EP dosage.
First, to test differences in the risks of infection for males and females, a two-sided test was carried out with respect to M/F ratio for pdmH1N1 and seasonal influenza.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com