Sentence examples for testimony is necessary from inspiring English sources

A year after the attacks, a new kind of testimony is necessary.

Wilpon and Katz's lawyers said that Koufax's and Morgenthau's testimony is necessary and would undercut the trustee's claims that the men had reason to worry about Madoff.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, a 1993 US Supreme Court case, determined that "reliable scientific evidence, including expert testimony, is necessary to prove a causal link between in-utero drug exposure and harm to a child after birth".

She questioned whether peer review of medical testimony was necessary.

But Mr. Adam, who at the start of this trial pledged that the former governor would indeed speak to jurors, contended on Tuesday that prosecutors had utterly failed to prove their case — and so no further testimony was necessary.

"The information requested," Judge Hogan wrote, "is very limited, all available means of obtaining the information have been exhausted, the testimony sought is necessary for completion of the investigation, and the testimony sought is expected to constitute direct evidence of innocence or guilt".

Mr. Risen's lawyers, backed by a flotilla of press organizations and journalists, argue that his testimony isn't necessary and that First Amendment protections, combined with legal precedent, should keep him out of court.

That means listening intently to online chatter by having a social media savvy intern dedicated to scouring social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc) looking to see how the public jury is reacting to any given bit of evidence or testimony is a necessary component of prosecuting to the fullest or defending vigorously.

A statement read: "In light of these testimonies, both parties feel it is necessary to make this decision.

"On the questions of the existence of climate change as a result of human activity and the grave environmental dangers posed by a failure to address it, no such expert testimony would be necessary," he said.

This is necessary to focus on the justification for accepting testimony that derives only from the norms of the conversational practice.