Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The experimental profiles obtained for the formulations tested were compared with the theoretical one by means of the difference factor (f1).
The average Raman potency results for the four products tested were compared with chromatographic reference methods and the spectroscopic data were found to be within ∼1 6% of those obtained with the reference method for the four products tested.
For comparison purpose, therefore, the results of the chemosensitivity assays based on the cell culture models tested were compared with that based on the tumor tissue-level chemosensitivity assays.
Similar(57)
Results provided from tests were compared with the analyses.
Additionally, the results of the pullout tests were compared with those of in-situ pullout tests.
The results from an UNDEX test were compared with the predictions from the validated numerical code.
The measured blast parameters from the experimental tests were compared with ConWep predicted data.
Results from experimental tensile testing were compared with the model predictions showing a good agreement.
The responses from laboratory testing were compared with the ANSYS finite element predictions.
High frequency fatigue tests were compared with conventional servo-hydraulic fatigue tests at 30 Hz.
The shear strengths of these drained tests were compared with two published yield models.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com