Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Rogers' factors and Berwick's rules apply, but the specifics of what constitutes better, relevant, simple, easily tested, visible to others, or the slack necessary for change will all require recalibration for the new context.
Similar(58)
The vetting process by early adopters can help improve the soundness of the solutions, as measured against Rogers' five factors: that the innovation is better, relevant, simple, easily tested, and visible to others.
However, due to experimental limitations, using laparoscopic technology in this study could only test visible variables or extending ones such as movement time and throughput without any consideration about the real tactile sense.
(Rogers [ 6]) 5 factors: 1. Better 2. Relevant to local context 3. Simple 4. Easily tested 5. Visible to others How do we accelerate innovation spread?
According to Rogers, ideas that are easily adoptable satisfy the following criteria; they are better than existing alternatives, they are relevant to the local context, they are simple and therefore easy to communicate and understand, they are easily tested, and they are visible to others.
Before those devices can be sold, they must be approved by the F.D.A., a process that makes their tests' performances more visible to the public.
So, Pt/TiO2 nanotubes can be tested under visible light to oxidate As III).
There is a big debate in medical circles among people interested in these things as to whether or not you can safely ignore painless bleeding into the urine which only shows up on testing and is not visible to the naked eye.
It monitors their work and instructs them how to do quality control tests, with the results visible to the customer in real-time.
Applications of the test stimuli were not visible to the patient at any time.
Disregarding faint test lines as negative results is a frequent error among end users [ 46], and this is of concern as faint test lines (which are barely visible to the naked eye) may occur in 17.8% of all positive test lines [ 37].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com