Exact(24)
Using a between subject design we experimentally tested the difference in food intake following a mood induction designed to induce joy or sadness (the joy vs. sad mood condition).
We also tested the difference in the relationship of plot α-diversity to habitat-specific γ-diversity between the Alps and the Scandes by comparing the slope coefficients of plot α-diversity against habitat-specific γ-diversity in both areas.
We tested the difference in the amount of captured voles per enclosure between E+ and E− grasses and also the difference in the belt crossings of voles/hour by using the exact Wilcoxon signed ranks test, and estimated the median difference and its 95% confidence interval (CI) by the Hodges-Lehmann procedure [32].
In addition, we tested the difference in the cumulative proportion of birds solving the test after each successive test round, and this analysis showed that the effect of treatment was mainly due to a slower acquisition in the stressed birds during the first part of the test series (fig 1 a and b).
To further rule out action tremor as a potential contributor to the above group differences in digit placement, we tested the difference in each digit contact point (a) variability and (b) modulation to object CM between patients with no vs. mild action tremor (3 vs. 6 patients, respectively).
Using 166 protein-truncating mutations, we tested the difference in variant allele fractions across tumor types.
Similar(36)
Furthermore, we tested the differences in SOM decomposition rates between grasslands and shrub vegetation.
To validate cluster-specific associations, we tested the differences in HRV and β-AR genotypes in estimated clusters based on first- and second-half ECG data.
We tested the differences in dichotomous variables with a χ2 or Fisher's exact test.
We tested the differences in patient expenditure and provider costs by using two statistical tests.
We also tested the differences in the distribution of gender in each treatment group using exact binomial probability test.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com