Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Toward the end of our analysis, we tested our list of misconceptions to ensure it was exhaustive.
Similar(59)
On the other hand, compared with the proposed method using PC, we further tested our method using a tablet listed in Table 4.
Thus, after correction for multiple testing, our lists of differentially expressed genes are highly conservative but necessary given our small sample sizes.
To test our hypothesis, a list of constitutively and alternatively spliced donor sites of the first exons was generated and structures were predicted by the RNAfold program (see methods).
To test our ideas, we rely on list experiments using national representative samples in 2007 and in 2008.
Most of the tests on our list are covered by PPO insurance plans.
To answer this question, we first tested the correlation between our list of protein interactions and Jordan et al.'s list of orthologs and evolutionary rates.
Additionally, we tested for concordance between our list of DE genes and a list of 2730 genes that were previously classified as DE between human and non-human primate iPSC lines (Marchetto et al., 2013b).
Repeating the male/female overlap test on our lists of ER QTL, we found seven transcript/marker pairs shared between the two lists (Fig. 3d), which is only slightly more than the random expectation of 1.2.
Something else to notice: Part of the reason why no luxury cars minus the Cadillac STS, which fared poorly in rear-collision tests–appear on our list is because automakers often put the newest, most expensive safety options in their high-end line first, to test driver acceptance.
To test this, we compared our list of down-regulated genes to two independently generated lists of maternal transcripts (Hooper et al. 2007; Tomancak et al. 2002, 2007) and found that 62.1% of the genes reduced due to mating in both uninfected and infected females have been identified as being maternally deposited into oocytes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com