Suggestions(2)
Exact(5)
All the synthesized compounds were tested for qualitative (Zone of inhibition) and quantitative (MIC) antimicrobial activities against four pathogenic bacteria Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and two pathogenic fungi Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger.
All the synthesized compounds were tested for qualitative (Zone of inhibition) and quantitative (MIC) antimicrobial activities against two pathogenic bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis (NCIM 2250) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and four pathogenic fungi such as Candida albicans (MTCC 277), Candida tropicalis (MTCC184), Aspergillus niger (MCIM 545) and Aspergillus clavatus (MTCC 132).
In addition, we tested for qualitative and quantitative sex differences in the etiology of phobic fear.
In addition, none of the studies, systematically tested for qualitative sex-differences, so no insight in possible effects of sex-specific genes and environmental factors is available.
First, we tested for qualitative gender differences, (i.e. whether the identity of the causal genes and environments were the same in men and women), by comparing correlations within same-gender and opposite-gender DZ pairs (because the only factor that is differentially shared is gender).
Similar(55)
Fisher's test for qualitative variable or Wilcoxon's test for quantitative analysis was used.
Comparative study by Student´s t-test for quantitative variables and using chi square test and Fisher test for qualitative variables.
Two-tailed Fisher's exact test for quantitative variables and Chi-square test for qualitative variable were used.
Comparisons between groups were performed using Fisher's exact test and Mann–Whitney test for qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively.
This article presents an overview of statistical methods used in validation and proficiency testing for qualitative testing in analytical chemistry, paying particular attention to interlaboratory study.
Univariate analyses were based on the t test for paired data (for quantitative variables) and the Mac Nemar Chi-squared test (for qualitative variables).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com