Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
The resulting soluble extract was tested for extraction efficiency compared to the total by fluorescent western blotting (Licor Odyssey).
Sonication using a Branson Digital Sonifier was used to prepare a soluble extract, which was tested for extraction efficiency compared to the total by fluorescent western blotting (Licor Odyssey).
Five SPME fibers were tested for extraction: carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS-75 μm), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS-100 μm), divinylbenzene/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/PDMS-65 μm), carbowax/divinylbenzene (CW/DVB-70 μm), and divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS-50/30 DVB/CAR/PDMS-50/30hich was shown to be the most efficient fiber to trap the volatile compounds.
For example, several types of fibre have been tested for extraction of these substances by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [ 156].
Most of the commercially available fibers except for a poly ethylene glycol) (PEG) fiber have been tested for extraction of SCMAs from aqueous samples.
An optimized cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method (TCM-CTAB) and three commonly-used extraction kits were tested for extraction of DNA from LDW samples.
Similar(53)
Two of the solvent systems (butanol/methanol, 3 1 and 1 1) previously tested for lipid extraction from plasma were found to provide adequate extraction for polar lipids, but incomplete extraction for triglycerides, especially highly lipophilic species.
and solvent (ethanol, 50%; 0.5 ml HCL + 99.5 ml methanol) were tested for maximizing extraction process.
In this work, an ATPS in a microfluidic platform was designed and tested for mAbs extraction.
Six SPME fibers were tested for the extraction capacities toward selected compounds, showing the best results for the polyacrylate fiber.
The PAs and nanocomposites were tested for their extraction capability of metal ions such as Cr3+, Co2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Hg2+ and Fe3+ from aqueous solutions either individually or in the mixture.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com