Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
If the disease followed a multiplicative-effect model with a disease prevalence of 13.4%, a genetic relative risk of 2, and a disease allele frequency of 0.2 0.4, the power of our two-stage analysis increased to 0.96 0.99 for a stringent test size of 5.45×10−7.
Given an additive-effect disease model with a prevalence of 13.4% for YOH [18], a genetic relative risk of 2, and a disease allele frequency of 0.2 0.4, the power of our two-stage analysis was 0.87 0.90 for a stringent test size of 5.45×10−7.
Comparisons were made with a Fisher's Exact or a Mann Whitney U test (size of hospital).
An implication of this latter difference is that the minimum test size of the EET is four binary choices, while the minimum test size of CET is just two binary choices.
The sample size was estimated separately for each trial assuming a one-sided test size of 5% and a power of 80%.
Estimation of the water level in cisterns before each test, size of the cisterns and information on wind and rain were also used.
Similar(50)
Mean test sizes of planktonic foraminifera, which were in sufficient numbers for statistical analysis, were calculated at the size intervals corresponding to the coarse sieves (Loeblich and Tappan 1988; Hayward et al. 2004).
Numerical accuracies are studied for some approximations of percent points and actual test sizes of T for two-way ANOVA test case based on the limiting distribution and an asymptotic expansion.
For instance, Karabatsos [ 15] generated data sets with sample sizes of 150, 500 and 1000 and test sizes of 20 and 50 items.
With increasing the mechanical-testing size of specimen, it is demonstrated that more pronounced action of elastic recoveries of testing machine and specimen led to a decrease in plasticity because of larger shear-strain was introduced in shear bands.
Without loss of generality, we assumed Θ0= 0. A test size, α, of 0.05 was used.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com