Exact(8)
The Spearman's rank correlation test of species similarity between the ten sites are shown in Table 3.
Spearman's rank correlation test of species similarity between the ten sites was also carried out using biodiversity professional software.
We assumed that the required power of the test is 0.8 (i.e. a type II error probability of 0.2) and that significance is tested for the one-sided hypotheses of a correlation coefficient >0 (left panel) and a loss of species over time on the same plots (paired test of species number at time point 1 < species number at time point 2).
A local BLAST search was used as a test of species identification ability.
However, continuous monitoring of individual clustering using STRUCTURE could provide a test of species integrity according to the concept of Genotypic Clusters.
provides a more robust test of species hypotheses since any one data source may provide a misleading estimate of cohesiveness or disjunction.
Similar(52)
Although burrowing has been utilised less than marble burying in the laboratory, it represents a sensitive and robust test of species-typical behaviour and – like marble burying – has been shown to be hippocampal-dependent (Deacon et al., 2002; Deacon, 2006).
The experiment underlined the need for experimental testing of species under natural forest canopy.
This research offers the ecological fundamental knowledge necessary for further selection and testing of species and final implementation into a successful green roof system.
We used null model testing of species co-occurrence and nestedness metrics estimated with our field data to ask whether SF species composition was segregated/aggregated, and if aggregated whether there was nestedness, i.e., whether species composition across sampling locations could be described by ordered subsets of species from the most species rich location in a landscape.
Tests of species co-occurrences revealed no ant mosaic structure since dominant species were generally independently distributed or positively associated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com