Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(7)
The neurocognitive assessment comprised the following measures (see Supporting Information; details at the end of this paper): Cambridge Gamble Test (CGT) [ 32 ]: a test of decision-making under risk.
During each exposure condition, participants completed a computer-based test of decision-making performance in which they were presented with scenarios and asked to make decisions based on a standardized protocol (Krishnamurthy et al. 2009; Satish et al. 2009; Streufert and Satish 1997).
Before and after each test of decision-making performance, participants also completed computer-based questionnaires on perceived indoor air quality and health symptoms.
Under each condition, participants completed a computer-based test of decision-making performance as well as questionnaires on health symptoms and perceived air quality.
In comparison to the widely used Iowa Gambling Task, the Cambridge Gamble Task is a test of decision-making under risk (i.e. with explicit probabilities) rather than ambiguity.
In conclusion, consistent with the task's design as a test of decision-making under explicit risk, we saw minimal evidence of learning-related changes in choice behavior, and importantly, these effects did not differ between the groups.
Similar(53)
Testing of decision-making performance.
Does depression impair performance on tests of decision-making capacity?
Participants and the person administering the tests of decision-making performance were not informed about specific CO2 conditions in each session.
The synthesis generated three main themes: the impact of point-of-care testing on decision-making, diagnosis and treatment; impact on clinical practice more broadly; and impact on patient-clinician relationships and perceived patient experience.
In image analysis, by extracting the features (statistical features, shape features, geometric features, texture features, etc). of the object under test, the process of decision-making is obtained by using the default criterion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com