Suggestions(1)
Exact(45)
D'Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test was used to test normal distribution.
A Shapiro-Wilk normality test, with a p = 0.05 rejection value, was used to test normal distribution of data prior further analysis.
Bone loss and osteoporosis develop so slowly in most women whose bones test normal at age 65 that many can safely wait as long as 15 years before having a second bone density test, researchers report in a new study.
During each scratch test, normal load, normal displacement, and lateral force were continuously recorded.
They use a camera to look under the chassis, they take 200 pictures and they do a dynamic test drive to listen for weird noises, test normal braking and acceleration, and check the alignment.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition has been shown to improve clinical myocardial ischemia in patients with syndrome X (angina pectoris, positive treadmill exercise test, normal coronary angiograms, and no evidence of coronary spasm).
Similar(15)
Circadian Hyper-Amplitude Tension Elevated Pulse Pressure DATA: MEAN ± SD * Analysis of Variance **Exact test Normal-weight and overweight participants had a flow-mediated brachial artery dilatation of 0.22 ± 0.06 and 0.20 ± 0.04 mm over resting (above reference) diameter, respectively.
Comparisons between groups were performed using t-test (normal distribution) and Mann-Whitney test (normality test failed).
All parameters were investigated for normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilks-Test). Statistical significance of differences (p < 0.05) was investigated using the unpaired t-test (normal distributed parameters) and the Mann-Whitney-U-Test (not-normal distributed parameters).
Statistical analysis of the data was performed with the two-tailed t-test using the GraphPad Instat software, and with the Z-test (normal approximation) using the Primer of Biostatistics software.
For single comparisons, unpaired t-test (normal distribution) or Mann–Whitney U-test were used.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com