Exact(4)
A single screening test is correct more than 99% of the time.
The final model selection in the stratified analysis that included variables of catchability was based on the AIC and DIC, assuming that the goodness of fit of this model, according to the likelihood ratio test, is correct.
The clinical detection of a tumor is a complex process, which, in the reductionist view, contains three elements: (i) the malignancy has developed; (ii) it is diagnosed in a clinical test; and (iii) the test is correct.
For the corresponding number of degrees of freedom (DOF=npoints – nparameters), – 19 for the LNTH and 16 for the sigmoid, – the corresponding p-value is p ~ 0.05 (p-value is the probability of obtaining experimental data at least as far from their expected values, as actually observed, assuming that the statistical hypothesis under test is correct).
Similar(56)
This result indicates that there is association between the HAM-detected genomic region and phenotype even when the association test is corrected to account for population structure.
My overnight accommodation (the bed in which I was sleeping the morning of the test) was correct, but I had failed to change the one hour testing slot, it was clearly impossible to be in both locations.
In a study of 1,586 patients who came to emergency rooms with shortness of breath, the test was correct 81percentt of the time, said Dr. Peter McCullough, chief of cardiology at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine and a lead investigator.
For multiple statistical comparisons, chi-square test was corrected by Bonferroni's correction.
Statistical significance of Mantel test was corrected a posteriori for multiple testing by applying Bonferroni correction.
Because Boneferroni's correction is generally employed for multiple comparisons, the Mann–Whitney U test was corrected by this method.
The p-values obtained from this test were corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini and Hochberg method [31].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com