Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The applicability of the Pseudomonas-siderophore system to the study of cooperation is evident from the number and range of social evolution hypotheses it has been used to test (for reviews see [30], [31]; for more recent work see [32], [33], [34]).
Similar(58)
Ymf genes in Tetrahymena Mt genome are in conserved ORFs, and are homologous among all five Tetrahymena species based on a similarity metric test (for review see reference 4).
The majority of high- and low-drinking selected rodent lines have been bred for their intake on some variation of this test (for review, see Spanagel 2000).
Many studies have established that the ECD of the p185 HER-2/neu is a p97-115 kDa fragment that can be released from normal or cancer cells and can be reproducibly and accurately measured in serum using a test (for review, see Carney and coworkers [ 18]) referred to as serum HER-2/neu.
Parallelepiped specimens with two different thicknesses have been tested for reviewing both failure modes by means of optical microscopy.
Even if the tech companies don't actually submit individual tests for review, just being aware of best practices could go a long way to keeping tests safe and compassionate.
Actively retrieving information on a test, even without feedback, results in better long-term retention of that material than does restudying that information, a phenomenon known as the testing effect (for reviews, see Dempster, 1996; Roediger & Karpicke, 2006).
The test for judicial review on matters not relating to the ISA remains the objective test.
Prior to 1988, the Singapore case of Lee Mau Seng v. Minister for Home Affairs (1971) was authority for the application of the subjective discretion test for judicial review of executive power exercised under the ISA.
These 31 video clips then comprised a test set for review by local health workers (see table 2).
These inconsistencies across methods partly reflect the influence of unknown genetic structure and demographic history on outlier detection tests (for recent reviews, see Narum and Hess 2011; De Mita et al. 2013; De Villemereuil et al. 2014; Lotterhos and Whitlock 2014).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com