Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Our systematic approach to screening requests to test for agents with the potential to threaten global health can prevent arbitrary decision making, reduce inappropriate testing, and increase the value of laboratory consultation.
It was originally created as a test for agents, involving four separate panels with four distinct codes.
Similar(58)
The scientists say the technique has several advantages: it lowers costs, facilitates testing for agents (B. miyamotoi, and especially Powassan virus) that are rarely tested for, and provides risk assessments for co-infections which may adversely affect the course of disease.
Serologic tests for agents of culture-negative endocarditis and tick-borne diseases were performed.
At our sentinel laboratory, we recognized these challenges and took steps to promote judicious use of testing for agents designated as global health threats.
However, while experts have focused on clinical indications for testing for agents of bioterrorism, laboratory methods for microbial identification, and needs for integrated communication networks (2 – 4 ), little attention has been given to how sentinel laboratories can effectively screen clinicians' requests for testing pathogens designated as global health threats.
Mr. McKay also said the system does not test for biological agents.
Therefore, most studies test for infectious agents or past infectious exposures at or after the time of diagnosis.
EPA and other international regulatory bodies have published mutagenicity testing requirements for agents (pesticides, pharmaceuticals, etc).
Ertapenem resistance was reported in 0.2% of all E. coli isolates and 0.9% of all K. pneumoniae isolates at the institutions that routinely test for this agent.
Its major strength is its unification and automation of abstract test suite generation and structured testing methodology for agent-based systems.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com