Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
"Surely his (limited) Test chances so far suggest he's too green for this match.
Other observers have pointed out that teachers who feel insecure about their ratings may focus on improving the test chances of their most able students at the expense of nurturing the capacities of the least able members of their classroom.
If you're in Atlanta, Houston, Seattle, Tampa, Orlando, Pittsburgh, Charlotte, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, Oklahoma City, Tulsa, New Orleans, or Charleston, fire up your device and give it a speed test — chances are, you're surrounded in 4G ish) radiowaves right this second.
A two-month ban for biting is unlikely to do his future Test chances any good, although he still swears it was all a terrible misunderstanding.
Jonny Bairstow hit a century to boost his England Test chances on a tightly-contested first day against Hampshire.
Similar(52)
The PPV was 56.7% in EAC and 88.7% in ESPOIR, these absolute chances were a little higher than the pre-test chances on RA (42% and 83%).
If you read enough practice tests, chances are good that when you take the test you've seen a majority of the words before.
The index in preC is significantly smaller than preA (t-test, t8 = 3.911, p<0.0045) and the chance level (one sample t-test, chance = 0, t3 = 3.558, p<0.038), whereas the index in preA is not different from chance (one sample t-test, chance = 0, t5 = 0.6153, p>0.56).
Water maze data were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA and spontaneous exploration task discrimination indices were analysed by one sample t-test (chance = 0) with Bonferroni correction.
Moreover, the reactivation index is not significantly different from chance in preA mice but is significantly below chance in preC mice (one sample t-test, chance = 0: preA, t11 = 1.582, p>0.14; preC, t10 = 6.316, p<0.0001).
Binomial tests (chance 50%) revealed that the Sham2 group swam to the correct zone significantly more often than predicted by chance (p =.0015; one-tailed), whereas the ATNx2 group did not.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com